Legal Opinion
Berry v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 20, 1961No. 4845PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
The parties agree that plaintiff’s damages are to be measured by the difference between the value of her land after the taking and what it would have been worth on the day of the taking had it not occurred. Edgcomb Steel Co. v. State, 100 N. H. 480, 486. To prove her damages the plaintiff offered the testimony of one expert who testified to the value, before and after the taking, of the 30 acre tract located on the east side of the new highway on which are located plaintiff’s house and other structures. Another expert testified to the “before and after” value of the 21 acres taken by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Cade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Lustine v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Welch v. Gonic Realty Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- City of Tucson v. LaForgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Lebanon Housing Authority v. National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Bartage, Inc. v. Manchester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.