DeParcq v. O'Brien
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
A controversy between the heirs of William Beldon, deceased, over the construction of his will has reached this court upon an appeal from a final decree of distribution of his estate.
By an holographic will the testator made certain specific bequests, among which is one of $30,000 to his sister, Rose DePareq. He also provided as follows: “My sister Rose is hereby appointed administratrix & executrix without Bonds of this will, to the legal Descendants of Roberts (Pat) Nellies 3 children Rosemary & Will & Frances & His 2 Grandchildren 15 per cent of the balance of my estates and 10 per cent to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Edwardson v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- O'Connor v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by64 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of AkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.