Legal Opinion

DeParcq v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1938No. L. A. 16113PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

A controversy between the heirs of William Beldon, deceased, over the construction of his will has reached this court upon an appeal from a final decree of distribution of his estate.

By an holographic will the testator made certain specific bequests, among which is one of $30,000 to his sister, Rose DePareq. He also provided as follows: “My sister Rose is hereby appointed administratrix & executrix without Bonds of this will, to the legal Descendants of Roberts (Pat) Nellies 3 children Rosemary & Will & Frances & His 2 Grandchildren 15 per cent of the balance of my estates and 10 per cent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Edwardson v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. O'Connor v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Estate of AkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API