Legal Opinion

Evered v. St. Croix Mines Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1930No. 4591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on three promissory notes aggregating with interest $2,410.33, one executed September, 1920, one April, 1921, and the other June, 1921, by the St. Croix Consolidated Mines, a corporation. The plaintiff was an indorser of the notes who paid them on default by the maker and brought this action, not against the maker, the St. Croix Consolidated Mines, but against the St. Croix Mines Corporation, on the theory that it succeeded to and acquired all of the assets real and personal of the maker, and hence became liable for its debts.

The case was tried to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bennett v. MinottOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rasmussen v. Sevier Valley Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Houser v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harold Christiansen, D/B/A Palmer-Christiansen Company v. Mechanical Contractors Bid Depository, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. Owen v. Seed Products Intern., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API