King v. Hartley
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Ripley Circuit Court; Robert A.. Creigmile, Judge. . Action by Grace M. King against Theophilus ft. Hartley, who filed a cross-complaint. From a judgment for defendant on his cross-complaint, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.
— Appellant commenced this action for partition of certain real estate.' According to the allegations of the complaint,' Sarah E. Hartley died intestate in 1885, the owner of the real estate in controversy, and'left as her sole and only heirs the appellee, Theophilus E. Hartley, and certain named children, including appellant. Some of the children had conveyed their interest in the real estate to their father, Theophilus, and all who had not so conveyed were made 'defendants. The appellee filed an answer in four paragraphs; the first was a general denial, demurrers were sustained to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnston v. GlancyIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- Mather v. ScolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Johnson v. PontiousIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Green v. GrovesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Johns v. JohnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Leverett v. LeverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Perkins v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Donnelly v. FletemeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Callihan v. BanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.