Callihan v. Bander
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.
The sole question presented here is the action of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer to appellant’s third amended complaint. The questioned complaint takes up 16 printed pages of appellant’s brief. We deem it necessary to set out only the substance of its allegations.
It is averred appellant entered into an oral contract with appellee Joe Bander, by which appellant was to receive Y& share in certain oil and gas leasehold estates which he might procure after said Ys share had paid its proportionate cost of development. It is further alleged that as a result of appellant’s efforts, said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Koehler v. KoehlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Campbell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Heal v. Niagara Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halbert v. HENDRIXIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hardy v. HeeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Tousley-Bixler Construction Co. v. Colgate Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Heeter v. HardyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948