Legal Opinion

Muller v. Hotsy Corp.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided February 21, 1996No. C 94-3040PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.1396

II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.1396

III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.1398

A. Undisputed Facts.1398

B. Disputed Facts.1400

IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS.1401

A. Disability Discrimination Under Federal Law.1402

1. The origins of the ADA.1402

2. Disability discrimination under the ADA.1405

a. “Regarded as having” a disability.1406

b. Qualified individual with a disability.1406

c. Analytical framework for ADA claims.1408

d. The prima facie case under the…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Sicard v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. Valentine v. American Home Shield Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Lucht v. Encompass Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API