Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This dispute is over a $3979 deduction taken from an employee’s bonus check. The question is whether Iowa Code chapter 91A (1999), our wage payment collection law, governs the controversy and, if so, whether the deduction violated section 91A.5(2)(c), which prohibits deductions for “[ljosses due to ... default of customer credit.”
The district court determined, as a matter of law, that chapter 91A applies to this dispute. So the factual debate over the nature and purpose of the deduction was submitted to the jury. But, relying on this court’s holding in Dallenbach v. Mapco Gas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Dallenbach v. MAPCO Gas Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Henriksen v. Younglove ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Muller v. Hotsy Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Matthew Jahnke v. Deere and Company, Richard Czarnecki, and Bernhard HaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Marcie Guerrero v. J.W. Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. Dollar GeneralDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.