Legal Opinion

Standard Motor Co. v. Shockey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Soper, O. J.). • Action by Ernest Shoekey against the Standard Motor Company. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The Standard Motor Company of Baltimore, Maryland, an automobile distributor engaged in the sale of Cadillac automobile in Maryland, on September 1st, 1917, entered into a contract with Ernest Shockey, an automobile dealer in Hagerstown, to sell to Mm Cadillac automobiles.

Ender this agreement the appellant, called the distributor, agreed to sell to the appellee, called the dealer, Cadillac automobiles’, automobile bodies and chassis at “net prices to1 be agreed upon from time to- time * * * at a discount of 15% from list prices,” to replace or repair defective parts- under certain conditions,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laubheimer v. NaillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Smith v. Woman's Medical CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. School Sisters of Notre Dame v. KusnittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. Legum v. BlankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Whitby v. Baltimore, Chesapeake & Atlantic Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Foster-Porter Enterprises, Inc. v. De MareCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Chevrolet Motor Co. v. GladdingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. Davis v. Minnesota Baptist Convention of MinneapolisWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Barish v. Chrysler CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API