Legal Opinion
Chevrolet Motor Co. v. Gladding
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1930No. 2934PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
This is an action for damages for breach of contract. Chevrolet Motor Company (appellant) entered into the contract with Ray Y. Gladding (appellee) on August 2, 1926. The contract was in writing and consisted of a “Memorandum,” “Appendix,” and an “Or*441der” covering a period of twelve months. The pertinent provisions of these instruments are printed in the margin.1
The contract contained three provisions for its termination at the option of appellant, It could he canceled without notice if ap*442pellee became insolvent, upon 10 days’ notice if be did not exclusively represent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Moon Motor Car Co. of New York v. Moon Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. DoerksenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Ford Motor Co. v. Kirkmyer Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Motor Car Supply Co. v. General Household Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.