Legal Opinion
Herman v. Sedor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 21, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 91-0025PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.
The only issue presented in this case is whether there was any evidence to support the giving of a jury instruction. We agree with appellant that there was not and remand for a new trial.
This tragic case arises out of the death of Andrew Herman, a two-and-a-half-year-old child who drowned on June 3, 1989 in a swimming pool at a Tucson residence where he lived with his maternal grandparents. The grandparents moved into the premises in August 1987 pursuant to a written lease with appellees Steven and Leonore Sedor. At that time, the child was seven months old. On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kauffman v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Spur Feeding Company v. FernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Mesa v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Hammer v. Bell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- City of Phoenix v. ClaussCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001