Legal Opinion

R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 91-0049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

This matter involves an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff con*243tractor, R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. (“Oxford”) filed a notice and claim of lien, based upon a contract for the construction of masonry footings and concrete slabs for Irwin and Olive Smith’s home. When filing of the lien failed to generate payment, Oxford filed a complaint for breach of contract and lien foreclosure. This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Oxford. The judgment foreclosed the mechanic’s lien, awarded damages for breach of contract, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McFarlin v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Todaro v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Price v. SunmasterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Rogers v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Karl v. US Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Dean v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Commerce v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API