City of Phoenix v. Clauss
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Grace M. Clauss (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment awarding her $1.25 million against the City of Phoenix in an eminent domain proceeding which resulted in the taking of an eighty-nine acre parcel on the northwest end of the South Mountain range. The primary issue presented is whether the trial court erred, under the fact situation presented here, by instructing the jury not to consider any decrease or increase in the condemned property’s value which resulted from either the taking itself or the planned public project that included the taking. We…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Harrison-Halsted Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1957
- United States v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Max Wolff v. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Pima County v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.