Legal Opinion

South Creek Associates v. Bixby & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 23, 1989No. 88SC62PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

South Creek Associates (South Creek), a general partnership which owns a shopping center in Boulder, Colorado, filed a quiet title action in Boulder County District Court seeking a judgment that Bixby & Associates, Inc. (Bixby), an adjoining landowner which is the operator of a private day school, has no right to use South Creek’s parking lot. Bixby claims a right to use the parking lot based on the provisions of a planned unit development (PUD) application submitted by McStain Enterprises, Inc. (McStain), the original owner and developer of both parcels involved in the present dispute, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Dillon Companies, Inc. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Story Bed & Breakfast, LLP v. Brown County Area Plan Commission and Patricia N. MarchIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. City of Lakewood v. MavromatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. McDowell v. United StatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Bolinger v. NealColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API