Legal Opinion
Ortman v. Thomas
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 7, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-75046PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Ortman is seeking recovery of damages and other relief from some twenty-two defendants based upon various related and unrelated alleged misdeeds. In nine separate motions, all twenty-two defendants are seeking dismissal and/or summary judgment. Plaintiff has responded to only four of the nine motions filed by defendants. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), the court will dispense with oral argument and decide the motions based upon the briefs submitted by the parties. For the reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ortman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ortman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ortman v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995