Legal Opinion

Ortman v. Thomas

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 31, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-75046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before this court are several motions filed by the defendants in this action for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 against the plaintiff, William J. Ortman. The defendants have brought these motions seeking awards of attorney fees incurred in this litigation and a permanent injunction prohibiting Ortman from filing any future civil lawsuits based upon or arising out of any of the legal or factual claims asserted in this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Safir v. United States Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Ortman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ortman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Holling v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API