Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Oliver v. Wilkes-Barre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1950No. Appeals, Nos. 161 to 164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action in mandamus was brought against the City of Wilkes-Barre, its Mayor and the members of City Council, to compel a reinstatement of plaintiffs as members of its police force. Judgment was entered for defendants on the pleadings and this appeal followed.

*25On January 20,1948, the City Council of the City of Wilkes-Barre passed a resolution placing plaintiffs William Oliver, Faust lorio, John A. Gazey and Edward J. Lenahan on the police force retirement list, effective as of February 1, 1948. Plaintiffs all had served the minimum number of years required by a city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  5. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Class of Two Hundred Administrative Faculty Members v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. ERWAY v. WallaceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Pennsylvania Land Title Ass'n v. East Stroudsburg Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Haas v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. McMonigle v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API