Legal Opinion

Class of Two Hundred Administrative Faculty Members v. Scanlon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1983No. 6 M.D. Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Justice.

This is an appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court, 64 Pa.Cmwlth. 387, 440 A.2d 1264, which dismissed appellants’ petition for review, in the nature of an action in mandamus, on the basis of the equitable defense of laches.

Appellants are administrative faculty members of various state colleges and one university in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 1 As administrative faculty members, appellants perform primarily administrative functions and possess titles such as inter alia: college registrar, director of financial aid, and dean of men/women. In contrast, academic…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. County of Allegheny v. Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Astenjohnson, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Weinberg v. Commonwealth, State Board of Examiners of Public AccountantsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Fulton v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API