Legal Opinion

McMonigle v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1956No. Appeal, 292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

On March 24, 1952, the plaintiff in this case, Frank X. McMonigle, was discharged by the pertinent municipal authorities from his position as clerk in the Children’s Agent Division of the office of the County Commissioners of Philadelphia at a salary of $3340 per annum. Nearly four years later, on January 29, 1956, he instituted mandamus proceedings against the City of Philadelphia and its City Commissioners demanding reinstatement. The defendant City filed preliminary objections seeking a more specific complaint, whereupon McMonigle filed an amended complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Truscott v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Schearer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Oliver v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Class of Two Hundred Administrative Faculty Members v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Conroy v. Kistler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1978
  3. Mortimer v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1957
  4. Mortimer v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API