Legal Opinion
Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 12, 2010No. 1:09-cv-02061PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND (Doc. 17.) AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY (Doc. 29.)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Before the court for decision is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case to the Stanislaus County Superior Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Plaintiffs contend that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action because inclusion as a defendant of a California resident, Harold Loeb, prevents complete diversity of citizenship between the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants oppose the motion on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Bennett v. Kingman, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Blain Lomen v. Thomas P. SchmalzriedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Bordenave v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Devillena v. American States Preferred Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.