Bennett v. Kingman, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Robert E Bennett, et al., No. CV-19-08001-PCT-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Kingman, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiffs Robert and Judith Bennett’s (collectively, the 16 “Bennetts”) Request for Writ of Mandamus Motion to Void Kingman City Ordinance 1471 17 (Doc. 40) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 48), and Defendant City of 18 Kingman’s (the “City”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 47). The Court now rules.1 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 The Bennetts own five acres of real…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.