Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 2002No. C5-01-2082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY, Judge. *
The district court granted respondents’ petition for a writ of mandamus, compelling appellant Otter Tail County (the county) to approve a preliminary plat for a new subdivision. On appeal, the county argues: (1) because respondents’ sole remedy was by a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals, the district court did not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus; and (2) the 60-day deadline imposed by Minn.Stat. § 15.99, subd. 2, was extended by operation of Minn.Stat. § 116D.04, subd. 10 (2000), which provides for a 30-day period in which to seek judicial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Intel-Foods Corporation v. AlexanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Allen v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005