Legal Opinion
David W. Lanier v. Ed Bryant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 17, 2003No. 00-6408PublishedCited by 344 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORESTER, Chief District Judge.
David W. Lanier, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court order granting summary judgment to the defendants in an action brought pursuant to the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985; and the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lanier brought this suit against former United States Attorney Ed Bryant, United…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by344 opinions
- Colvin v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Amanda Reich v. City of Elizabethtown, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- McQuillion v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.