Legal Opinion
McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 2004No. 01-16037PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Carl McQuillion (“McQuillion”) and his co-plaintiffs (“co-plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their civil rights complaint against the Board of Prison Terms (the “Board”) and the Governor of California, inter alia, for allegedly administering California’s parole statutes to achieve an unwritten, unconstitutional policy of denying parole to inmates convicted of certain offenses. We affirm.
I
In 1979, following a 1973 conviction for murder, the Community Release Board, as the Board was named at the time, found McQuillion suitable for parole. The Board moved up his parole…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Louis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- McQUILLION v. SCHWARZENEGGERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Walker v. WoodfordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.