Legal Opinion

Barry v. University of Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004No. S-10178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The question presented is whether a pre-retirement release bars an employee’s claim for a later breach of an employer’s promise to recognize that the employee had twenty years of allowable service. We answer this question in the negative because a release cannot govern the enforceability of a promise to be performed after the release.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

When his retirement pay fell short of the amount he expected, Douglas Barry sued both the University of Alaska and the Teachers’ Retirement System. We are concerned on appeal only with his claim…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Witt v. WatkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Holmberg v. State, Division of Risk ManagementAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Tybus v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. B.R. v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Regner v. North Star Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Odsather v. RichardsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API