Legal Opinion

B.R. v. State, Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. S-11438PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Clarence Bullock, a physician’s assistant employed by the Aaska Department of Corrections, sexually assaulted a female inmate, B.R., while treating her at the Anchorage *432Jail. B.R. sued the department for damages, alleging that it was liable as Bullock’s employer, and also that it negligently hired and failed to adequately train its employees. The superior court granted summary judgment to the department, relying on an Alaska law that immunizes state agencies from liability for intentional wrongs such as assaults. We reverse. Although the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Leleux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Joanne Bembenista v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State, Department of Corrections v. HeiseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Capolicchio v. LevyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Regner v. North Star Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API