Legal Opinion

Holmberg v. State, Division of Risk Management

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1990No. S-3230PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

Karen Holmberg asks us to reverse the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (“AWCB”) decision denying her permanent total disability benefits on the ground that a later decision of the Public Employees Retirement Board (“PERB”) conclusively determined that she was not physically able to perform her duties as an employee of the State of Alaska. While we find no substantial reason to refuse to give preclu-sive effect to PERB determinations in AWCB proceedings in general, we refuse to give such effect to the PERB determination in this case for two independently sufficient…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Norman v. BucklewMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Osborne v. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Smith v. MaloufMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Redrock Valley Ranch, LLC v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API