Legal Opinion
Natural Law Party of the United States v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-1025(ESH)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the Natural Law Party of the United States (Natural Law Party), along with Dr. John Hagelin and Dr. Mike Tompkins, the Natural Law Party’s 1996 candidates for President and Vice President, bring this action seeking judicial review of the Federal Election Commission’s (FEC) dismissal of their 1996 administrative complaint. In their complaint to the FEC, plaintiffs, who were excluded from participation in the 1996 presidential debates, challenged the candidate selection criteria used by the debates’ staging organization — the Committee on…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Damus v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Grace v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- La Botz v. Federal Election Commission of Washington, D.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mallof v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- La Botz v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.