Legal Opinion
Mallof v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 5, 2010No. 09-AA-182PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Petitioners David J. Mallof, Elizabeth B. Elliott, and John D. Hanrahan live and vote in Ward 2 of the District of Columbia. They complained to the Office of Campaign Finance in the Board of Elections and Ethics that a candidate running for the Ward 2 seat on the Council of the District of Columbia had violated the city’s campaign finance law by using District government resources to support his campaign. The Office of Campaign Finance investigated the complaint and found no violation. Petitioners asked the Board to review that determination, but the Board concluded…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martin Scahill & HRH Servs. LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- District of Columbia Office of Tax & Revenue v. Bae System Enterprise System Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Scahill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- DONALD ROTUNDA v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.