Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Hunt
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1987No. 85-770PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
In District of Columbia v. Hunt, 520 A.2d 300 (D.C.1987), we held that the Federal Backpay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1982) was still applicable to certain District employees, and that this Act mandated that appellee Henry B. Hunt be awarded attorney’s fees and legal costs incurred before agency appeal boards and the Superior Court during his successful litigation of an adverse personnel action by the District of Columbia. Mr. Hunt now seeks an award of the fees and costs incurred in litigating the appellate portion of this proceeding before this court.
The Federal Backpay Act’s mandate of…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Charles E. Gavette v. Office of Personnel Management and Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Henderson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- District of Columbia v. HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Stansel v. American Security BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. Jerry M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- General Federation of Women's Clubs v. Iron Gate Inn, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ungar v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.