Tonkoff v. Roche Fruit & Produce Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
According to the amended complaint, between September 1, 1923, and June 30, 1924, the respondent delivered to the appellant, a commission merchant, for sale on commission, a large quantity of apples, and the appellant deducted from the proceeds of the sale over $2,000; it is claimed that, pursuant to ch. 134, Laws of 1923, p. 366 [Rem. 1923 Sup., § 8292], the appellant could not have legally charged over $1,200. The prayer is made for the amount of the over-payment. According to the appellant’s answer, the respondent and appellant entered into an oral contract by which the appellant was to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Rice v. RuddimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Gillis v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Tracy v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Dent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cedarhome Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Gronvold v. WhaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.