Legal Opinion

Dent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cedarhome Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1927No. 20127. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Respondent brought this action to repossess itself of a lumber mill, equipment and supplies previously sold to appellant under a conditional sales contract, and which was claimed to be in default.

Answer was filed denying default, and setting up a cross-complaint which, in substance, alleged an oral agreement between the parties through their respective officers, whereby the appellant was to enlarge and improve the capacity of the mill and to grant to respondent, a brokerage company, the exclusive right to handle all appellant’s products, and receive one dollar per thousand therefor; that, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Tracy v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Moore v. CoeyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Tonkoff v. Roche Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Land v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Peabody v. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Campbell v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API