Legal Opinion

Meyers v. McQueen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought in justice's court.' The plaintiff's declaration was verbal, and as follows:

“Plaintiff declares on all the common counts, and for work and labor performed, and especially on an agreement entered into on and about April 17, 1887, between plaintiff and defendant, by which the plaintiff agreed to 'keep house for the defendant, and, as recompense for the same, the said defendant agreed to pay all expenses of moving, and furnish the plaintiff and her two children *157with clothes and with board for at least one year; and which agreement the defendant has failed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raub v. NisbettMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Richards v. F. C. Matthews & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Liquidating Holding Corp. v. Mortgage & Contract Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Campbell v. Davidson-Martin Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API