Campbell v. Davidson-Martin Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair; Vance, J. Assumpsit by Robert Campbell against the Davidson-Martin Manufacturing Company for the breach of a contract to purchase certain machines. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for $1,210. The defendant has brought the case here by writ of error. I cannot state the questions involved in the case better than to quote from the language of the trial judge, the late Judge Vance, in his* charge to the .jury, which is as follows:
“The plaintiff claims that on or about April 6, 1894, the defendant, through its president, A. S. Martin, gave the plaintiff an order to manufacture for it twelve 15-inch Wizard purifiers of whitewood; that the defendant gave plaintiff about the same time an order to manufacture five small…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Gates v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Peek v. Detroit Novelty WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Dayton v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ebert v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911