Legal Opinion

Richards v. F. C. Matthews & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 35,498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

On June 3,1929, Howard Bichards, plaintiff, entered into a dealer’s agreement with F. C. Matthews & Company, a Michigan corporation, defendant, the distributor of “Frigidaire” iceless refrigerators for southwestern Michigan. The con tract gave plaintiff the exclusive right to sell ‘ ‘ Frigidaires ’ ’ and parts in Kalamazoo county. It set forth the discounts off the list price plaintiff would be entitled to, obligated him to look after the service of the “Frigidaires” of both former and prospective customers, and detailed the rights and obligations of the respective parties. The contract was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mount Ida School for Girls v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Dolomite Limestone Products Co. v. Kennedyman Saun Manfg. & Engineering Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Meyers v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ButcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lieberman v. SolomonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Liquidating Holding Corp. v. Mortgage & Contract Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API