Legal Opinion

Raub v. Nisbett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Samuel E. Raub presented a claim against the estate of Stephen S. Wilcox, deceased. The claim was disallowed by the commissioners, and-claimant appealed to the circuit court. Erom a judgment for claimant, William P. Nisbett, administrator, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff filed with the probate court a claim entitled as follows: “Bill of Particulars of Unsettled Claim of Samuel F. Raub against the Estate of Stephen S. Wilcox, Deceased.” The first item-was dated September 27, 1887, and the last, October, 1889, the total claim being $15,145.49. The property described in the claim consisted of shingles, a shingle mill, and land. The affidavit attached to the claim stated that the estate was indebted to him in about the sum of $4,000, as near as he could estimate -the same. The claim was disallowed by the commissioners. Plaintiff appealed, and in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Meyers v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Hubbard's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pietrantonio v. Tonn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Raub v. NisbettMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re Turner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Potter v. HarveySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API