City of Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
*723CARTER, J.
— I dissent.
I agree with the majority opinion that the trial court erred in concluding that the decree in the abatement action determined the issues raised in this action. I am further convinced, however, that the trial court erred also in concluding that Los Angeles is excused from performing its contractual obligations by reason of impossibility.
It is the general rule, so well established that it requires but token citation of authority, that the mere fact that performance of a promise is made more difficult and expensive than the parties anticipated when the contract was made,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.