Legal Opinion
In Re Northern Pigment Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 23, 1934No. Customs Appeal 3746PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The Northern Pigment Company et'al. have here appealed from the findings and recommendations made by the United States Tariff Commission pursuant to section 337, Tariff Aet of 1930 (19 USCA § 1337).
Said findings and recommendations were made after an investigation was made by said Commission upon complaint of the Magnetic Pigment Company, a New York corporation, in which complaint it was alleged that Bruce Ross, Limited, a Canadian corpora^ tion of Toronto, and others, were causing to be imported into this country yellow oxide of iron pigments produced by the Northern…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Baltimore Bedding Corp. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Gemtron Corp. v. Saint-Gobain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Amtorg Trading CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In Re Orion Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.