Legal Opinion

Burdick v. R.A.S. (In re R.A.S.)

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2019No. 20190016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

*164[¶1] R.A.S. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge and continuing commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. The order denying R.A.S.'s petition for discharge is reversed for lack of findings sufficient to conclude the due process requirement has been met under Kansas v. Crane , 534 U.S. 407, 122 S.Ct. 867, 151 L.Ed.2d 856 (2002).

I

[¶2] R.A.S. was convicted of gross sexual imposition in 1991 and sentenced to eight years. In 2001 R.A.S. was convicted of possession of stolen property, and in 2002 assault on a corrections officer. As part of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of MuschaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Interest of SternbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Interest of J.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API