Legal Opinion

Byers v. Voisine (In Re Voisine)

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2018No. 20170442PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶1] Raymond Voisine appeals from an order denying his petition for discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude clear and convincing evidence supports the district court's findings and order and the court did not misapply the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm.

I

[¶2] In 2004, Voisine was incarcerated after he pled guilty to gross sexual imposition for acts involving a six-year-old victim. In Matter of Voisine , 2010 ND 17 , ¶¶ 2-4, 777 N.W.2d 908 , this Court discussed the underlying facts leading to his incarceration and subsequent commitment as a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Puklich v. PuklichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Matter of DidierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Matter of MuschaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Interest of G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API