Byers v. Voisine (In Re Voisine)
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Jensen, Justice.
[¶1] Raymond Voisine appeals from an order denying his petition for discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude clear and convincing evidence supports the district court's findings and order and the court did not misapply the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm.
I
[¶2] In 2004, Voisine was incarcerated after he pled guilty to gross sexual imposition for acts involving a six-year-old victim. In Matter of Voisine , 2010 ND 17 , ¶¶ 2-4, 777 N.W.2d 908 , this Court discussed the underlying facts leading to his incarceration and subsequent commitment as a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Puklich v. PuklichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Matter of DidierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Matter of MuschaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Interest of G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.