Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lyle v. Willett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. ' Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — A. J. Tyler, Chancellor, by interchange.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The hill in this case was filed by the State of Tennessee on relation of Cy. H. Lyle and D. M. Guinn, citizens and taxpayers of Washington county, and John H. Caldwell, democratic congressional nominee in the First Tennessee district, against George W. Willett, J. H. Pierce, and J. A. Nines, election commissioners for Washington county, and H. C. Beasley, Jr., and S. P. Bolton, election registrars for the second ward or precinct of the Ninth civil district of Washington county. The purpose of the bill was to obtain a mandamus to compel the election commissioners and registrars of election to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ohio v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Wolcott v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Foley v. ShriverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  5. McMahon v. PolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Evans v. CornmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hunter v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Arledge v. MabryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ryan v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Arapajolu v. McMenaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API