Legal Opinion
Arapajolu v. McMenamin
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1952No. Civ. 15575PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The petitioners, 15 in number, seek by writ of mandate to compel respondents, county clerk of Monterey County and his deputy in charge of the registration of voters, to qualify them as registered voters of said county.
All of the petitioners reside on military reservations situated within the exterior boundaries of Monterey County, some at Fort Ord, some at the Presidio of Monterey, and the others at Hunter Liggett Military Reservation. Some of the petitioners are civilian employees of the United States Government, some are in the armed forces of the United States, some are spouses of persons…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Evans v. CornmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Adams v. LondereeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fenton v. Groveland Community Services DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Acosta v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rothfels v. SouthworthUtah Supreme Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.