Legal Opinion

Arledge v. Mabry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1948No. 5144PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The primary question for decision is whether that portion of Precinct No. 17 in Sandoval County, acquired by the United States through condemnation proceedings and incorporated into what is popularly known as the Los Alamos Project, is "in New Mexico" within the true meaning of Art. 7, § 1 of the New Mexico Constitution defining the qualifications of an elector entitled to vote at all elections for public officers. Incidentally, the right to vote of residents of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Evans v. CornmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Adams v. LondereeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Begay v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Montoya v. BolackNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API