Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Conner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This appeal involves the validity of chapter 101 of the Acts of 1921, to fix the salaries of certain county officials, and provide for the disposition of the fees of their office. Four previous acts, intended to transfer fees to the public treasury and compensate officials by a fixed salary, were declared void.

Chapter 8 of Acts of 1879 was held void because viola-tive of article 2, section 17, of the Constitution, in State v. McCann, 4 Lea, 14.

Chapter 124, Acts of 1897, was declared void in Weaver v. Davidson County, 104 Tenn., 316, 59 S. W., 1105, because it circumscribed the authority of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ogilvie v. HaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ryan v. Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Boarman v. JaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bayless v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Davidson County v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API