Legal Opinion

Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc. v. Contico International, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 15, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-049-HPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc. (“Rubbermaid”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Winchester, Virginia. Defendant Contico International, Inc. (“Contico”) is a Missouri corporation having its principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Rubbermaid’s complaint is for patent infringement, trade dress infringement and unfair competition in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, and common law trademark infringement. The dispute arises out of Contico’s production, marketing, and sale of its “Huskee Squares” trash…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Bancorp, L.L.C. v. Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Etrangers a MonacoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  2. Sharper Image Corp. v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc. v. AirSep Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Eurotech, Inc. v. Cosmos European Travels AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Amazon. Com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API