Legal Opinion

Amazon. Com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. Com, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 1, 1999No. C99-1695PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

73 F.Supp.2d 1228 (1999)

AMAZON.COM, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, INC., and Barnesandnoble.Com, LLC, Defendants.

No. C99-1695P.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington.

December 1, 1999.

David J. Burman, Jerry A. Riedinger, Brian G. Bodine, Perkins Coie, Seattle, WA, Lynn H. Pasahow, J. David Hadden, McCutchen Doyle Brown & Enersen, Palo Alto, CA, Christopher B. Hockett, McCutchen Doyle Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff.

Warren Joseph Rheaume, Koren Koubourlis, Foster Pepper & Shefelman, Seattle, WA, Steven I. Wallach, Jonathan A. Marshall, Ronald M. Daignault, Steven…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rothman v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Buffalo Technology Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API