Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc. v. AirSep Corp.

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT WITH CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT

A. The Parties

B. The Patents In Suit

1. The Claims

a. The ‘303 Patent

b. The‘224 Patent

2. The Specifications

a. The ‘303 Patent

b. The ‘224 Patent

3. The Prosecution History of the ‘303 Patent

C. Sunrise’s Entry Into the OCD Market

D. AirSep’s Development of the ImPulse Select

E. The Witnesses

F. Likelihood of success on the merits

1. Ownership

2. Infringement

a. The ‘303 Patent

i. Whether AirSep’s ImPulse Select “Employed a Method” in Violation of the ‘303 Patent CO CO

ii. Alleged…