Legal Opinion
State v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 29, 1979No. 76-3725, CA 7612PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Defendant was charged with murder, the indictment alleging that he
"did intentionally and unlawfully cause the death of * * * a human being, by shooting him with a .38 caliber handgun; and, in the alternative, while engaged in the course of and in furtherance of attempting to commit robbery, and while in immediate flight therefrom, the said [defendant] did cause the death of * * * a human being, who was not then and there a participant, by shooting him with a .38 caliber handgun * *
Defendant was convicted of murder after a jury trial. He appeals.
Motion to Suppress
Defendant first argues that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. RobertiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.