Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1979No. 76-3725, CA 7612PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.

Defendant was charged with murder, the indictment alleging that he

"did intentionally and unlawfully cause the death of * * * a human being, by shooting him with a .38 caliber handgun; and, in the alternative, while engaged in the course of and in furtherance of attempting to commit robbery, and while in immediate flight therefrom, the said [defendant] did cause the death of * * * a human being, who was not then and there a participant, by shooting him with a .38 caliber handgun * *

Defendant was convicted of murder after a jury trial. He appeals.

Motion to Suppress

Defendant first argues that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. RobertiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API