Legal Opinion

State v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1980No. 10-79-08668, CA 18187; No. 10-80-02563, CA 18189; No. 10-80-02563, CA 18189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (ORS 164.135). In addition, based mainly on the conduct which resulted in that conviction, defendant’s probation for two earlier offenses was revoked. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from both orders revoking his probation. We have consolidated them for purposes of disposition on appeal. His contention in both appeals is that he made inculpatory statements under circumstances which violated his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L Ed 2d 694, 10 ALR 3d 974 (1966), and those…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. NettlesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. BuchholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. BuchholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API