Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1980No. 78-4039, CA 13684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of burglary in the first degree. On appeal he assigns as errors: (1) refusal to suppress statements he made prior to Miranda warnings, (2) failure to give a requested jury instruction concerning definition of burglar’s tools, (3) overruling an objection to appearance of a witness for the state without notice to defendant prior to trial and (4) denial of defendant’s motion to strike hearsay comments of the prosecutor at the sentencing proceeding. We consider in detail only the first and last assignments.

Responding to a dispatch to assist city police…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. State v. RobertiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. State v. DeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API