Legal Opinion

Koppe v. Hilton & Thompson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1929No. 27,156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission denying relator compensation.

The referee found for relator. On appeal the industrial commission reversed the decision, finding that relator did not “sustain an accidental injury arising out of and during the course of said employment, and that the disability to said employe’s left wrist extending over a period from about July 9, 1927, to about January 1, 1928, was not the result of accidental injury.” One commissioner dissented.

The uncontradicted testimony is that relator, an office assistant of an attorney, while doing her work on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Benson v. County of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Lampi v. James H. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Miller v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Downing v. MaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. First National Bank v. Van De PutteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Baaken v. Naufft & BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Baaken v. Naufft & BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API